The big cricket debate
      Have been following the Indian Cricket League vs BCCI scrap story for a while now. Quite closely, what with the series of shows that we have done ever since the ‘Rebel League’ was launched. And it certainly is a most fascinating story, the way it has panned out so far.
But what’s interesting is where the story has reached now:
- Around 50 domestic cricketers have defected to the ICL
- A number of cricketers past and present from other countries have also joined the party
- Kapil Dev and a number of other former cricketers have joined the ICL in administrative capacities
- The BCCI has announced no ban on the defectors, but have announced that these cricketers will not be eligible for any BCCI benefits
- The BCCI has also, though not in as many words, said that defectors will face a life ban from the BCCI
- The ICL has decided to go ahead anyway
But what does all this add up to?
- Kapil (and others like More, Patil, Prasanna, Sandhu, Chauhan, et al) are clear winners in the story – they will be part of the ICL, make a lot of money, work full-time, and be looked upon as martyrs for having been sacked from the BCCI
- The domestic tournaments – Ranji Trophy, Duleep Trophy, etc – will suffer for the moment, with a number of leading cricketers missing from the set-up
- The cricketers who have joined the ICL will make a fair amount of money, which no one will grudge
But the biggest point is something else altogether…the ICL will not succeed. Obviously.
- For years now, we have bemoaned the lack of spectator interest in domestic cricket tournaments. Now, does the ICL realistically expect people like Dinesh Mongia, Nilesh Kulkarni, Deep Dasgupta, Ambati Rayudu and others to start attracting the crowds?
- Does the ICL realistically expect the Indian cricket-watching public to throng the grounds only because Brian Lara is there?
- Or does the ICL expect people like Inzamam-ul-Haq and Mohammad Yousuf to attract the crowds? Inzamam! In a Twenty20 format! Comic relief, maybe. And what about Yousuf?
- Or is the ICL banking on Nicky Boje and Lance Klusener? Klusener at his peak might have been a draw, but now? And Boje, a spinner who doesn’t even get picked in the South African team, where Graeme Smith is currently the number one spinner!
What will the ICL be selling itself with then? I haven’t found an answer to that. And pushing the answer further towards the negative end is the fact that the ICL is unlikely to get a single big stadium from the BCCI or a single umpire of any repute.
Kapil, yesterday, was at our studios, and I did a very ‘successful’ show with him, where he actually said that the BCCI is ‘ruthless’, is doing ‘dadagiri’ and that he would go on a ‘hunger strike’ if good performers in the ICL are ignored by the BCCI. I agree with everything he said. But where are these youngsters whose performances should be monitored by the BCCI? Rayudu? Jhunjhunwala? Who else? Nilesh Kulkarni?
I could go on and on here, and not move a muscle from the original understanding behind the creation of the ICL – a big statement made by Zee in anger after having lost the TV deal. But the story is interesting. Except that there’s not a single party that stands to gain (except in that they will make a few dents in the opposition).
Mihir Bose writes on the story here.
And Siddharth Monga writes a well-argued piece here.
    But what’s interesting is where the story has reached now:
- Around 50 domestic cricketers have defected to the ICL
- A number of cricketers past and present from other countries have also joined the party
- Kapil Dev and a number of other former cricketers have joined the ICL in administrative capacities
- The BCCI has announced no ban on the defectors, but have announced that these cricketers will not be eligible for any BCCI benefits
- The BCCI has also, though not in as many words, said that defectors will face a life ban from the BCCI
- The ICL has decided to go ahead anyway
But what does all this add up to?
- Kapil (and others like More, Patil, Prasanna, Sandhu, Chauhan, et al) are clear winners in the story – they will be part of the ICL, make a lot of money, work full-time, and be looked upon as martyrs for having been sacked from the BCCI
- The domestic tournaments – Ranji Trophy, Duleep Trophy, etc – will suffer for the moment, with a number of leading cricketers missing from the set-up
- The cricketers who have joined the ICL will make a fair amount of money, which no one will grudge
But the biggest point is something else altogether…the ICL will not succeed. Obviously.
- For years now, we have bemoaned the lack of spectator interest in domestic cricket tournaments. Now, does the ICL realistically expect people like Dinesh Mongia, Nilesh Kulkarni, Deep Dasgupta, Ambati Rayudu and others to start attracting the crowds?
- Does the ICL realistically expect the Indian cricket-watching public to throng the grounds only because Brian Lara is there?
- Or does the ICL expect people like Inzamam-ul-Haq and Mohammad Yousuf to attract the crowds? Inzamam! In a Twenty20 format! Comic relief, maybe. And what about Yousuf?
- Or is the ICL banking on Nicky Boje and Lance Klusener? Klusener at his peak might have been a draw, but now? And Boje, a spinner who doesn’t even get picked in the South African team, where Graeme Smith is currently the number one spinner!
What will the ICL be selling itself with then? I haven’t found an answer to that. And pushing the answer further towards the negative end is the fact that the ICL is unlikely to get a single big stadium from the BCCI or a single umpire of any repute.
Kapil, yesterday, was at our studios, and I did a very ‘successful’ show with him, where he actually said that the BCCI is ‘ruthless’, is doing ‘dadagiri’ and that he would go on a ‘hunger strike’ if good performers in the ICL are ignored by the BCCI. I agree with everything he said. But where are these youngsters whose performances should be monitored by the BCCI? Rayudu? Jhunjhunwala? Who else? Nilesh Kulkarni?
I could go on and on here, and not move a muscle from the original understanding behind the creation of the ICL – a big statement made by Zee in anger after having lost the TV deal. But the story is interesting. Except that there’s not a single party that stands to gain (except in that they will make a few dents in the opposition).
Mihir Bose writes on the story here.
And Siddharth Monga writes a well-argued piece here.
But I am on Bedi’s side. 
So if you are a young Indian or Pakistani or Sri Lankan bowler, you can try chucking in your formative years if you feel it helps your performance. Chances are that it will be legal by the time you make it to the team.
Chopta is interesting, in that it’s not really a ‘place’. It’s just a group of temporary stalls/shops and a couple of quaint rest-houses that vanish in the off-season only to resurface when the tourist season starts. We were the first tourists of the season – which starts only around late August – and that meant a lot of very happy hosts who were willing to do a little more for us than they would otherwise.
Having started at about 9.00am, we reached Tunganath at around mid-day, the last stretch a bit wet as the skies opened up.
Prayers were not priority, but figuring out all the sights certainly were. And the few hours post lunch were spent exploring the valley, and catching a bit of shut-eye (okay, I was the only one doing it).
I don’t think there’s a single mountainous place in the world that is anything but stunning, and Deoriya Taal was no different. The walk leading up to the Taal was the most glorious part, with a Kalatop-ish stretch just before you come face to face with the Taal. Varuni suggested that there’s no way a Taal could exist there, right at the top of the mountain, but there it was.
Admittedly, it’s become a bit of tourism-friendly place, with a clutch of dark green dustbins and manicured stretches, but the Taal itself is breathtaking. Deep forests surround it, rolling meadows cup it, and green, green water flows inside it, making it about as picturesque as picturesque gets.
Zidane's headbutt on Materazzi - who had been taunting him - was one of the defining images of the final that Italy won on penalties. The France midfielder was sent off, ending his stellar career with a red card.